Comparative Assessment Of Efficiency, Pain & Time Taken in Caries Removal by Laser , Polymer Bur And Traditional Method.

Comparative Assessment Of Efficiency, Pain & Time Taken in Caries Removal by Er,Cr:YSGG Laser , Polymer Bur And Traditional Method For Class I Pit & Fissure Caries Of Molars

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/09/057546

Enrollment

Registered

2023-09-13

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K025- Dental caries on pit and fissure surface

Interventions

Intervention1: polymer burs Er:Cr YSGG laser: polymer burs and erbium laser will be used to remove dental caries Control Intervention1: carbide burs: carbide burs will be used for removing dental car

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Medically fit patients in age group of 18-50. 2. Mandibular 1st and 2nd Molar with Class 1 occlusal caries 3. Caries not involving pulp 4. Asymptomatic tooth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients below the age of 18 and above the age of 50 2. Patients with Arrested caries and Caries involving Pulp 3. Periodontally compromised tooth 4. Previously treated tooth 5. Medically Compromised patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To Assess and compare Efficiency, Pain & Time taken during three different caries removal method namely Er,Cr:YSGG Lasers, Polymer bur & Traditional method in Caries removal of ClassI Pit & Fissure Caries of Molars Timepoint: baseline, 4weeks,6months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shweta Rathi

VSPM DENTAL COLLEGE

prshenoi@gmail.com9822220506

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026