study comparing two ultrasonographic techniques in overweight and obese patients for confirmation of endotracheal intubation

Randomized study between tracheal and pleural ultrasonography comparing time for confirmation of correct placement of endotracheal tube in overweight and Obese patients. - Comparison between two ultrasonography techniques for confirmation of endotracheal intubation

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/09/057545

Enrollment

Registered

2023-09-13

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Tracheal and Pkeural Ultrasonography in overweight and obese class: Timing for each will be noted

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Iand II Patients Patients posted foe elective surgeries under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. Overweight(BMI 25 to 29.9)Obese class I(BMI 30 to 34.9)and Class II(BMI 35 to 39.9)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients refusal Patients with mouth opening less than 2 fingers Patients with Cervical spine disorders Patients with abnormal airway anatomy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To see if tracheal sonography is faster and effective than pleural sonographyTimepoint: Outcome will be regularly assessed after 6 wks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare time required by tracheal and pleural ultrasonography with time of auscultation for endotracheal tube placementTimepoint: time in seconds	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Neha Wakhare

Bharati hospital

shwetajm81@gmail.com9823890369

Outcome results