CIMT WITH PNF VS NMES WITH PNF IN HEMIPARETIC PATIENTS

To Compare The Effect of CIMT With PNF Versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with PNF To Improve Upper Limb Function in Hemiparetic Pateints - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/09/057193

Enrollment

Registered

2023-09-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: CIMT with PNF: cimt with pnf for 8 weeks 4d/wk Intervention2: NMES with PNF: NMES WITH PNF FOR 8 WEEKS 4D/WK Control Intervention1: NMES WITH PNF: 4D/WK FOR 8WKS

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Sub-Acute Stage of Stroke and MAS along with GCS score of 15 will be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: HEMIPARESIS DUE TO OTHER REASONS OR TRAUMA, MEDICALLY UNSTABLE, PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS,COGINITVE ISSUES, VISUAL DEFECTS

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
UEFI FMA-UETimepoint: At baseline and after 8 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sandeep Kumar

SGRR institute of Medical & Health Sciences

drskumarmalik@gmail.com9412468744

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026