FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare two different methods of measuring cardiac output in seriously ill patients in ICU

Comparison between Transpulmonary Thermodilution (PiCCO) and Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) for Cardiac Output estimation in critically ill patients - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/08/057148
Enrollment
25
Registered
2023-08-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C00-D49- Neoplasms Health Condition 2: I95-I99- Other and unspecified disorders of the circulatory system

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NA Control Intervention1: NIL: NA

Sponsors

Tata Memorial Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult patients (70 yrs 18 yrs) 2. Patients in whom CO is being monitored with transpulmonary thermodilution method.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Presence of arrhythmias 2. Presence of aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis or ascending aortic disease documented by echocardiography

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the precision & limits of agreement in the cardiac output measurement by Pressure Recording Analytical method (PRAM) with thermodilution (PiCCO) in critically ill patients.Timepoint: Until ICU discharge—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There is no secondary outcomeTimepoint: There is no secondary outcome—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Atul Kulkarni

Tata Memorial Hospital

kaivalyaak@yahoo.co.in9869077526

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026