FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the pros and cons by conventional and digital method for assessing head to toe examination at home

An expanded ecosystem time and motion comparison study of the present conventional paper system and COMPREHENSIV: Head-to-Toe mHealthapplication @ Home based system to understand segment-wise data and service flow advantages, challenges, and modifications - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/08/056835
Enrollment
120
Registered
2023-08-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Hi Rapid Lab Pvt Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants willing to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants not willing to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Documentation of the present analog processes & capture the details of present workflow.Timepoint: 5 days—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Segmenting the workflow using various parameters like location, personnel, activity for both systems & to compare themTimepoint: 5 days—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Suresh Munuswamy

Indian Institute of Public Health - Hyderabad

s.munuswamy@iiphh.org9959560333

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026