Skip to content

To compare two volumes of local anesthetic in caudal block

Comparison of cranial spread of two different volumes of local anesthetic using ultrasound guided caudal block in pediatric patients - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/08/056724
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-08-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N33- Bladder disorders in diseases classified elsewhere Health Condition 2: Q541- Hypospadias, penile Health Condition 3: N358- Other urethral stricture

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Drug volume: 0.5mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine Control Intervention2: Drug volume: 1.0mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine

Sponsors

Department of Anesthesia Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of medical sciences and Dr RML Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American society of Anesthesiology- I-II patients Posted for urogenital surgeries requiring caudal block

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal of consent Known allergy to local anaesthetic Known coagulopathy Spine deformity or previous spine surgery Infection at puncture site Preexisting neurological condition

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of cranial spread in relation to body weight, height, age & body mass indexTimepoint: Zero seconds after drug injection

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The highest level achieved by the local anesthetic will be determined by counting from the previously marked T12 spinous process.Timepoint: Zero secs after drug injection

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Neerja Banerjee

Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of medical sciences and Dr RML Hospital

neerja.banerjee@gmail.com9810517575

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026