GUM ESTHETICS

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MODIFIED MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND CONVENTIONAL PAPILLA PRESERVATION TECHNIQUE IN ESTHETIC AREAS - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/08/056698

Enrollment

Registered

2023-08-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: MODIFIED MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: To evaluate papilla height, gingival marginal position, width of keratinised gingiva, clinical attachment level gain in patients treated

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient’s age-20-60years Patients diagnosed with chronic periodontitis with radiographic bone loss Anterior teeth Nordland and Tarnow Classification of papilla Class-II & III • Probing pocket depth >5mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant and lactating women Patients with systemic diseases Smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Compare And Evaluate Interdental Papilla Height Between Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique And Conventional Papilla Preservation TechniqueTimepoint: Baseline 1 Month 3 Months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
GINGIVAL RECESSION KERATINISED TISSUE WIDTH PROBING POCKET DEPTHTimepoint: BASELINE 1 MONTH 3 MONTHS	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR KUNDARAPU NIHARIKA

KAMINENI INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES

vikramreddydr@gmail.com9849990058

Outcome results