Skip to content

Comparison of two diiferent supraglottic airway devices as conduit to microcuff endotracheal tube in paediatric surgeries

Comparison of safety margin of AIRQ versus I-Gel devices as conduit to microcuff endotracheal tube in paediatric surgeries-A randomised interventional study in Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/08/056645
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-08-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Patientâ??s airway will be secured with Air-Q: Comparison of safety margin of Air-Q versus I-Gel devices as Conduit to microcuff endotracheal tube in paediatric Surgeries-a randomised

Sponsors

Department of Anesthesiology SMS Medical College and attached Hospitals, Jaipur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade I & II. Undergoing elective paediatric surgery requiring endotracheal intubation. Parents or Caregivers willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with airway related conditions such as trismus, limited mouth opening, trauma or mass,anticipated difficult intubation. Risk of gastric aspiration. Children with upper respiratory tract infection. If more than 3 attempts taken to intubate than exclude the particular patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess & compare the Safety Margin in cms(1-4 cms) in both study groups i.e. Air-Q versus I-Gel.Timepoint: After insertion of device.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the intraoperative hemodynamic changes-Heart rate,SBP,DBP & MAP between both groups.Timepoint: Baseline. After induction of anaesthesia. Immediately after intubation. 1 min after intubation. 3 mins after intubation. 5 mins after intubation. 7 mins after intubation. 10 mins after intubation. ;To determine the difference in Fibreoptic Grade of view (Brimacombe score) in both study groups.Timepoint: After insertion of device.;To determine the difference in the mean Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) at zero & 10 mins post insertion of SAD in both study groups.Timepoint: At zero & 10 mins post insertion.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ritesh Kumar Sompura

SMS Medical College, Jaipur

pratibha.rathore3@gmail.com9414446473

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026