Skip to content

Effect of addition of Backward walking to traditional treatment on pain, balance, walking pattern, strength, flexibility, disability and mobility in patients with Knee pain

Effect of Retro walking as an Adjunct to conventional treatment on Pain, Balance, Gait, Muscle strength, Flexibility, Functional disability and Mobility in patients with knee Osteoarthritis - not applicable

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/08/056593
Enrollment
42
Registered
2023-08-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M171- Unilateral primary osteoarthritisof knee

Interventions

Intervention1: Retro walking along with conventional physiotherapy treatment for patients with OA knee: Participants in group B(experimental group ) will receive conventional treatment along with retr

Sponsors

Jamia Millia Islamia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) Individuals fulfilling, clinical criteria listed by the American College of Rheumatology: knee pain and any three out of the following six criteria (age >50 years; morning stiffness lasting b)Individuals on Grade 2 and 3 or mild to moderate as per Kellgren and Lawrence scale. c)Individuals with knee pain for more than 6 weeks. d)Age: above 40 (male and female). e)Patient with body mass index less than 25 kg/m2 f)In case of bilateral involvement more severely involve knee will be considered. g)Patients with pain less than 7 or equal to 3 or more on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals will be excluded from the study if they will have. a)Any underlying pathology, History of ankle disease, Congenital deformities, other systemic arthritis, recent surgeries, trauma, or fractures of the lower limb b)Known cases of severe osteoporosis. c)With any neurological disorder including balance issues and motor and sensory loss. d)Taking intraarticular injection for knee pain for the last 6 months e)Presence of acute joint effusion f)Individuals having visual dysfunction or refractory errors are not corrected with glasses or contact lenses. g)Individuals having baseline history of established coronary artery disease (CAD), typical angina or heart failure. h)Patient with metal implant or cardiac pacemaker. i)Patients with uncontrolled arterial hypertension, atrial fibrillation or flutter, hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, cerebrovascular disease (history of stroke, transient ischemic attacks, or carotid artery surgery), are contraindicated to the exercise test were not included in the study. (American College of Sports Medicine. ACSMââ?¬•s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (8th edition).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
a)Pain intensity on the NPRS scale, b)Kinematic parameters of Gait( including Stride length, Step length, Stride time, Step time, Gait velocity & Cadence) using kinovea software c)Balance parameters ( including COP sway, COP range, Proprioception, Reaction time, & Multidimensional stability) using pedalosensa move d)Muscle strength ( hip flexor to hip extensor strength ratio & quadriceps to hamstring strength ratio ) using Lafayette dynamometerTimepoint: week 0 , after 3rd week & after completion of 6th week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a)Functional disability score using KOOS scale, b)Functional mobility using Time up & go test, & muscle c) muscle flexibility Timepoint: week 0 , after 3rd week & after completion of 6th week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMehnoor Khatoon

Jamia Millia Islamia

veqar.zubia@gmail.com9958993486

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026