Skip to content

Comparison of airway tube in gynaecological surgeries

AComparative prospective study of laryngeal mask airway(LMA)protector and supreme in laproscopic gynaecological abdominal surgeries - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/08/056579
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-08-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N00-N99- Diseases of the genitourinary system

Interventions

Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of YCMH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA-1,ASA-2 of laproscopic Tubal ligation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA3,ASA-4 BMI more than 35 Anticipated difficult intubation risk of aspiration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to assess ease of insertion in terms of time taken for insertionTimepoint: baseline during procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure ease of gastric tube insertion postoperative blood stain postoperative sore throatTimepoint: From procedure till 24 hours after postsurgery

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrAfreen Ansari

Post Graduate Institute of Yashwantrao Chavan Medical Hospital

hhnarkhede@gmail.com9820120440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026