Comparison of Macro and Microsurgical technique in treatment of gingival recession

Comparison between Macro And Microsurgical technique with Coronally Advanced Flap using Collagen Barrier Membrane in the management of isolated Millers class I gingival Recession defects - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/08/056559

Enrollment

Registered

2023-08-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional surgery and microsurgery: coronally advanced flap procedure performed by conventional method and microsurgical method in the treatment of gingival recessions Intervention2:

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age group 25-40years. 2. Subjects who are apparently healthy. 3. Presence of Millerâ??s Class I gingival recession. 4. Width of keratinized gingiva (KGW) >=2 mm. 5. Presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) 6. Patients who are willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients under medication. 2. Wasting diseases 3. Presence of caries, furcations involvement in isolated gingival recessions. 4. Pregnant or lactating females 5. Drug and alcohol abuse. 6. Tobacco users 7. Tooth mobility.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Keratinized Gingival Width (KGW) Wound Healing Index (WHI) Percentage of Root Coverage (PRC) Timepoint: baseline, 3 months,6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Plaque Index (PI) Gingival Index (GI) Probing Depth (PD) Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) Gingival Thickness (GT) Timepoint: baseline, 3 months,6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactG Lalasa

Sibar Institute Of Dental Sciences

anumala.deepas@gmail.com9618501146

Outcome results