FindTrial
Sign In

To compare between the usual anaesthetic technique with enhanced recovery after anaesthesia techniques in patients having surgery under endoscopic guidence through nasal cavity in base of skull surgeries.

Comparison of enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional anesthesia technique on postoperative recovery in the patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries : A prospective randomized study. - Nill

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/08/056337
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-08-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C719- Malignant neoplasm of brain, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional technique: Enhanced recovery after surgery technique will be compared with Conventional technique for perioperative management to see the effectiveness of one method over t

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medial Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1, 2 No consent Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference between quality of postoperative recovery in both groupsTimepoint: preoperative , 24 hours postoperative—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Day of ambulationTimepoint: 24 hours;Duration of Hospital stayTimepoint: 24 hrs;Post operative nausea vomitingTimepoint: 24 hrs;Pain scoreTimepoint: 2 hrs to 24 hrs;Patient satisfaction scoreTimepoint: 24 hrs;Postoperative complicationsTimepoint: 24 hrs—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shelly

AIIMS Hospital

doctor.manbir@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026