FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the results of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in an Indian context. When compared to follicular phase stimulation alone, can luteal phase stimulation maximize results?

Comparison of outcome of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in Indian scenario. Does luteal phase stimulation maximize outcomes when compared to follicular phase stimulation alone? - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/08/056183
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-08-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z314- Encounter for procreative investigation and testing

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Dr Aruna Rajan
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Poseidon 3 and 4 category (AFC History of Previous Poor response ( If the Number of blastocyst formed is less than or equal to 2 in follicular phase stimulation in Normal responders. Patient insisting on Luteal phase Stimulation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: SOAT. Genetic Abnormalities. More than 4 good quality blastocyst formed in Follicular phase Stimulation though inclusion criteria satisfied. Patients not willing for Luteal Phase Stimulation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
M2 rate , Stimulation & ICSI cancellation rate, Fertilization rate , cleavage rate, Blastocyst rate, Good Blastocyst rate Timepoint: 1 week after FPS stimulation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not applicableTimepoint: Not applicable—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aruna Rajan

A4 Hospital and Maternity Centre

aruna@a4fertility.com9841269578

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026