Comparative assessment of backward movement of upper teeth using two different treatment modalities

Comparative evaluation of maxillary arch distalization in subjects with Class II Division I malocclusion with two different treatment modalities- A randomized clinical trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/08/056058

Enrollment

Registered

2023-08-03

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Modified C Palatal Plate: Patients with Class II Division I malocclusion treated with a modified palatal plate reinforcing skeletal palatal anchorage for the purpose of en masse maxilla

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects with Class II Division I malocclusion with orthognathic mandible Lesser than a full cusp molar Class II Overjet > 7mm Healthy condyle relationship Extraction of third molars

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with underlying systemic/pathological conditions Deranged temporomandibular joint dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Amount of distalization Amount of molar intrusion Amount of molar distal tipping Timepoint: Initial, 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Airway changes Soft tissue profile changes Patient comfort factorsTimepoint: Initial, 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nagachandran KS

Saveetha Dental College and Hospital

orthodrnaga21@gmail.com9884152660

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026