FindTrial
Sign In

STUDY COMPARING TWO METHODS OF MASK HOLDING FOR OXYGENATION DURING STARTING OF GENERAL ANAESTHESIA

EFFECTIVENESS OF ONE HANDED, INVERTED V TECHNIQUE FOR MASK VENTILATION IN ANAESTHETISED, UNCONSCIOUS PATIENTS- A CROSS OVER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/07/055789
Enrollment
137
Registered
2023-07-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

NONE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.All patients of age 12 and above. 2.Patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. 3.Patients under ASA-PS I, II and III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient refusal. 2.Patients with painful maxillo-facial injuries. 3.Patient with major respiratory and cardiac co-morbidities. 4.Pregnant ladies. 5.Patients requiring RSI/ awake intubation. 6.Cervical spine injuries.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To study & assess the adequacy of one-handed mask holding with the inverted V technique in anaesthetized patients using ventilatory parameters like VTe/VTi ratio, Peak airway pressure, End tidal O2, End tidal CO2,and SpO2 achievedTimepoint: After induction—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To study comfort level among mask holders with the inverted V technique 2.To find out if there are any adverse effects associated with these techniquesTimepoint: After procedure—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactROJA C

K. S. HEGDE MEDICAL ACADEMY

anandabangera@gmail.com9845278880

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026