FindTrial
Sign In

A comparision between continous closure and intermittent smead jones closure of rectus muscles in midline laparatomy incision

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INTERMITTENT SMEAD JONES RECTUS CLOSURE AND CONTINOUS RECTUS CLOSURE IN MIDLINE LAPROTOMY WOUND - Nil

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/07/055688
Enrollment
98
Registered
2023-07-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Jawahar lal nehru medical college wardha
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All participants that require midline exploratory laparatomy either emergency or elective

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy Patients not willing for study Patients requiring 2 or more surgeries through same incision within the period initial 30 post operative days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcome of wound dehiscence ,burst abdomen,incisional hernia repairTimepoint: at baseline(day 0),6 week, 3 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Maulik Maheshwari

Datta meghe institute of higher education

drharshalsurg@yahoo.com9766631898

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026