FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparison between plating and nailing in distal femur fractures.

A comparative study of locking compression plate vs retrograde nailing in distal femur fractures.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/07/055486
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-07-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S724- Fracture of lower end of femur

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Locking Compression plate and Retrograde Nailing: functional Outcome

Sponsors

Syed Mohd Shoaib
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: skeletally mature patients AO type A and type C1 Distal femur fractures Closed or Gustilo type 1 and type 2 fractures Unilateral fractures patients who were able to walk without any assistance before injury

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Gustilo type 3 open fractures pathological fractures periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures fracture associated with neurovascular injuries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
fracture union knee range of motion functional outcome measurement using HSSTimepoint: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks , 6 months , 1 year—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Extensor lag Non Union Delayed Union Malreduction Knee Pain Knee Stiffness InfectionTimepoint: 2 weeks, 6 weeks , 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSyed Mohd Shoaib

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, JNMC, AMU

drzulfiqarortho@gmail.com9756640470

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026