Skip to content

Comparison of analgesia in laparoscopic hernia surgery between two approaches of quadratus lumborum block

A Prospective Comparative study for Post operative analgesia in Lateral QL vs Anterior QL block for patients undergoing Laparoscopic TEP - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/07/055439
Enrollment
78
Registered
2023-07-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene

Interventions

Intervention1: anterior quadratus lumborum block : Quaqdratus lumborum block has been an established analgesia technique given for analgesia for abdominal surgery, anterior quadratus lumborum block is

Sponsors

Ahmad Nawaz Khan
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA Grade I & II 2. Both sexes 3. Age 18 years - 60 years 4. Weight 40 kg - 70 kg 5. MPS Grade 1 & 2 6. No underlying significant morbidity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ASA Grade III & IV 2. Age less than 18 & more than 60 years 3. Patients Refusal to Study 4. Patient with cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic diseases, Impaired renal or hepatic function, neuromuscular disease 5. Patients with Known Allergy or Hypersensitivity to the drugs used in this study 6. Patients with Known Difficult Airway / Obesity / Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Lateral QLB in patients undergoing Laparoscopic TEP 2.To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Anterior QLB in patients undergoing Laparoscopic TEP 3.Comparative analysis of the two, using NRS scoring Timepoint: 1.To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Lateral QLB in patients undergoing Laparoscopic TEP 2.To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Anterior QLB in patients undergoing Laparoscopic TEP 3.Comparative analysis of the two, using NRS scoring at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to evaluate the requirement of rescue analgesics in either groupTimepoint: 3,6,12,24,36 hours

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAhmad Nawaz Khan

Care Hospitals, Bhubaneswar

drriteshroy@yahoo.com9667723814

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026