Skip to content

Evaluation of the placement of tooth implant using three different techniques and patient experience.

Computer Aided versus Conventional implant placement in assessing Precision, Predictability and Patient reported outcome measures-A Randomized Controlled Trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/07/055423
Enrollment
45
Registered
2023-07-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Dynamic Navigation system .: Implants will be placed in edentulous mandibular posterior areas using Dynamic navigation system(Navident). Accuracy check will be assessed using Evalunav m

Sponsors

Veeramallu Nageswari
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age range of 20-60 years 2. Partially edentulous mandibular premolars and molars 3.Adequate bone depth and width for implant placement 4.Anatomically suitable for all three protocols (a) Freehand implant placement (b) Static CAIS (c) Dynamic CAIS 5.ASA 1 and 2 classification patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases 2. Pregnancy or lactating women 3. Chronic smokers 4. Patients with infectious diseases (HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C ) 5. Known allergy to any component of the implant or implant guide 6. Patients undergoing radiation therapy 7. Patients under bisphosphonate therapy 8.Patients under antibiotic therapy 9. INR >2.5s

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Entry (2d) deviation 2. Apical (3d) deviation 3. Apex (v) deviation 4. Angular deviation 5. Pre-operative patientâ??s expectations from dental implant surgery. 6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery Timepoint: 1. Entry (2d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement 2. Apical (3d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement 3. Apex (v) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement 4. Angular deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement 5. Pre-operative patientâ??s expectations from dental implant surgery at baseline 6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery at 6hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographical parameters 1.Crestal bone loss Clinical parameters 2.Implant stability Timepoint: crestal bone loss at baseline, 3 & 6 months & implant stability at 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGautami S Penmetsa

Vishnu Dental College

gautamipenmetsa@gmail.com9951011618

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026