To compare total intravenous anaesthesia (propofol) with inhalational anaesthetic agent desflurane in terms of surgical field quality in functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus desflurane as inhalational agent on surgical field quality in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized, prospective, comparative, observational study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/07/055404

Enrollment

Registered

2023-07-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J310- Chronic rhinitis Health Condition 2: J329- Chronic sinusitis, unspecified Health Condition 3: J349- Unspecified disorder of nose and nasal sinuses

Interventions

Intervention1: Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol for hypotensive anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine as adjuvant: Dexmedetomidine at 1mcg/kg for 10 mins as induction dose followed by 0.2mcg-0.7

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age- 18 to 65 years of both gender ASA grade I and II undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age 65 years ASA grade III and IV

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
surgical field qualityTimepoint: at 5 minutes, at 10 minutes, 20 minutes, at 30 minutes, at 40 minutes	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Time of emergence from anaesthesia 2.Requirement of rescue hypotensive agentTimepoint: usage of rescue hypotensive agent to maintain mean arterial pressure between 55-65 mm Hg	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rajesh Kumar Harish

Fortis Hospital

hearty2brainy@yahoo.com9417661053

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026