FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two methods (ultrasound guided and landmark ) of analgesia by caudal block in neonates undergoing infraumbilical surgeries

Comparison of Ultrasound - guided versus landmark technique for caudal block in neonates undergoing infraumbilical surgeries

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/07/055399
Enrollment
44
Registered
2023-07-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: - Health Condition 3: 3- Administration

Interventions

Intervention1: USG Guided Caudal Block: Ultrasound â?? guided caudal block is hypothesised to have higher success rate in comparison to landmark technique in neonates undergoing infraumbilical surgeri

Sponsors

Vardhman mahavir medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 0 to 28 days undergoing infraumbilical surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with infection at the site of caudal injection, bleeding diathesis, allergy to local anaesthetics , Prior neurological or spinal disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare first Puncture success rate between ultrasound guided & landmark technique block in units undergoing infraumbilical surgeriesTimepoint: Baseline , at surgical incision, 0 hour , 4 hours , 8 hours—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken in performing the caudal Block number of attempts success of block duration of analgesia haemodynamic monitoringTimepoint: Intra operative & post operative—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactParul Chauhan

Vardhman mahavir medical college and Safdarjung hospital

Charu.bamba@gmail.com8700511643

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026