FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two different mesh outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery

Light weight mesh vs Ultralight weight mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair. - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/054523
Enrollment
62
Registered
2023-06-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene

Interventions

Control Intervention1: nil: nil

Sponsors

Kodidala Sri Charitha
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All adult patients with unilateral /Bilateral groin hernia who underwent elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Recurrent inguinal hernia 2. Patients with history of previous surgery in the inguino-scrotal region 3. Patients who underwent any other surgery concurrent with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare outcomes of light weight mesh vs ultralight weight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in terms of Postoperative pain (Postoperative day 0,1,2), Chronic groin pain, Seroma formationTimepoint: Day 0, Day 1, Day 2—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare outcomes of light weight mesh vs ultralight weight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in terms of Hospital stay, Other intraoperative & postoperative complications, Mesh infection, Time to return to routine activities, RecurrenceTimepoint: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPavan Madhukar Bhat

Kasturba Medical College and Hospital

pavan.bhat@manipal.edu9731243720

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026