Skip to content

To compare the success rate of feeding tube insertion in anesthetized patients by 3 different methods

A Comparison of two different methods of Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion with the conventional method in anaesthetized & intubated patients- A Prospective Randomized Control Trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/054368
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-06-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 2- Placement Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Naso-Gastric(NG) tube insertion: NG tube insertion using C-Mac videolaryngoscope, for the period of study i.e 1 year 6 months Intervention2: Naso-Gastric (NG) tube insertion: NG tube in

Sponsors

Kasturba Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18-70 years American Society of Anesthesiologists – physical status (ASA-PS) class 1 and 2 patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with Head trauma 2. Nasal mass 3. Significant deviated nasal septum 4. Cleft lip & cleft palate 5. History of laryngeal surgery 6. Base of skull lesion 7. History of corrosive poisoning 8. Esophageal pathology 9. Recent radiotherapy to the neck 10. BMI >40 kg/m2 11. Unstable cervical spine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare success rates of C Mac assisted NGT insertion & Reverse Sellicks method assisted NGT insertion in anaesthetized intubated patients with the conventional blind technique of NGT insertionTimepoint: Compare the success rates between the three methods by observing first insertion success at baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the time required for insertion of NGT by the three different methods of NGT insertion Timepoint: Time taken from insertion till confirmation of gurgling sounds over stomach with 20 ml of air at baseline;Compare the complication rates between the methods Timepoint: Identify the different complications & their rates between the three methods at baseline

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aparna Satish

Kasturba Medical College

malavika.muralidhar@gmail.com9844241620

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026