Skip to content

Stainless Steel vs. Titanium for Achieving Perfect Filling Fit and Shape in Class II Composite Restorations: A Clinical Study

Comparative clinical and radiographical evaluation of efficacy of stainless steel and titanium sectional matrix systems in obtaining proximal contact tightness and contour in Class II composite restorations: A randomized clinical study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/054272
Enrollment
52
Registered
2023-06-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: comparing stainless steel sectionsal matrix system with titanium sectional matrix system: comparing stainless steel sectional matrix system with titanium sectional matrix system in obta

Sponsors

Dr Abhya Jain
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.unilateral Class 2 Carious lesions in molars and premolars (GV BLACKâ??S CLASSIFICATION). not extending beyond the axial line angles and having no symptoms of irreversible pulpitis will be included in the study. 2. A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent form will be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with poor oral hygiene, diastema between posterior teeth due to periodontal problems, severe periodontal disease, mal-aligned and heavy bruxism resulting in lost physiologic contour, will be excluded. 21 2. Tooth indicated as an abutment for fixed partial denture and tooth having more than grade 1 mobility. 3. Teeth with developmental anomaly or pathology or congenital defects will be excluded. 4. Patients with Non restorable subgingival caries will be excluded. 5. Patients with occlusal discrepancies will be excluded from the study. 6. Pregnant and lactating mothers will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to evaluate proximal contact tightness contour in class II composite restorations using two different sectional matrix systemsTimepoint: baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate Color match, Marginal adaptation, Anatomic form, Surface roughness, and Sensitivity of Class II composite restorations using two different matrix systemsTimepoint: baseline

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abhya Jain
nshah7873@gmail.com9998994299

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026