Skip to content

Comparing TRUENAT� versus GENEXPERT® test for diagnosis of musculoskeletal Tuberculosis

Comparative Evaluation of chip based (TRUENAT�) versus Cartridge based (GENEXPERT®) test for diagnosis of Musculoskeletal Tuberculosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/054262
Enrollment
76
Registered
2023-06-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: A180- Tuberculosis of bones and joints

Interventions

Intervention1: Pus aspiration: The pus aspirated will be subjected to Truenat and Cbnaat and Mgit test and the results will be compared Control Intervention1: TrueNat vs CBNAAT: results of truant wil

Sponsors

Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with probable diagnosis of musculoskeletal tuberculosis based on clinico-radiological criteria with pus collection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with inaccessible collection of pus where therapeutic surgery is not indicated. Patients where sample obtained is less than 1.5 ml

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of TrueNatTM detecting musculoskeletal tuberculosis as compared to GENEXPERT®Timepoint: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of TrueNatTM detecting Rifampicin resistance in musculoskeletal tuberculosis as compared to GENEXPERT®Timepoint: 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sumit Sural

Maulana Azad Medical College

sumitsural@hotmail.com9968604323

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026