FindTrial
Sign In

TO COMPARE THE RESULTS OF FEEDING JEJUNOSTOMY VS NASOJEJUNAL FEEDING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING WHIPPLES SURGERY.

Comparing the outcomes of nasojejunal feeding with feeding jejunostomy in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/054072
Enrollment
160
Registered
2023-06-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Nasojejunal feeding: Before completion of gastrojejunostomy, nasojejunal feeding tube will be inserted per nasally and will be passed across gastrojejunostomy anastomosis to lie in jeju

Sponsors

Department of surgical Gastroenterology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients planned for pancreaticoduodenectomy for any indication. 2. Patients willing to participate in study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients not willing to participate in study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Incidence of delayed gastric emptying. 2. Time to remove feeding tube. 3. Operative time. 4. Tube blockage. 5. Accidental tube removal. 6. Discomfort associated with tube.Timepoint: -DURING PARENT ADMISSION UPTO 2 WEEKS.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Postoperative pancreatic fistula. 2. Post pancreatectomy hemorrhage.Timepoint: -UPTO 6 WEEKS.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGurlal Singh

SVIMS tirupati

drvrreddy1974@gmail.com9493629119

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026