Skip to content

A Comparative Assessment of Three Different Behaviour Modification Techniques using Physiological & Psychological Parameters- An Clinical Study

A Comparative Assessment of Three Different Behaviour Modification Techniques Using Physiological and Psychological Parameters: An In-Vivo Study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/054043
Enrollment
88
Registered
2023-06-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Group I - Audio-distraction: Children treated in the influence of Audio-distraction Intervention2: Group II - Aroma-therapy: Children treated in the influence of Aromatherapy Interventi

Sponsors

Mukesh Kumar Dey
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children within age group of 4-11 years, having their first dental visit. 2. Children who fall under the American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) category I (defined as a normal healthy patient). 3. Children and parents who are willing to participate in the study. 4. Children without any systemic and mental disorders. 5. Children who fall under Wrightâ??s modification of Franklâ??s behaviour rating (FBR) scale of 2 (-) or 3 (+), which includes patients with either negative or positive attitude respectively.22 6. A child having a carious cavity lesion, in one of the primary molars, requiring restoration without the administration of local anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Children with special healthcare needs. 2. Negative history of any particular underlying disease. 3. Children or parents who refused to participate in the study. 4. Children having pain or who required local anaesthesia administration for treatment. 5. Emergency need such as drainage of abscess or extraction. 6. Pulpal exposure of tooth during caries removal. 7. Children whose behaviour could be rated as definitely positive (++) or definitely negative (--), according to Wrightâ??s modification of Franklâ??s behaviour rating scale.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expected outcome in general, is to help combat dental anxiety among children, so that they grow into adults who arent fearful of getting any dental treatment done on themselves in the future, upon requirement.Timepoint: Baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Expectation is to develop a society of individuals who do not fear the dental environment, so as to have lower prevelance of dental problems in the future.Timepoint: 8 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMukesh Kumar Dey

Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences

grover.kavita@gmail.com9721222260

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026