Skip to content

Pulpotomy in mature permanent tooth using various biomaterials

A Comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes of coronal pulpotomy using biodentine alone versus combination of PRF & biodentine in mature permanent mandibular molars diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/053989
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-06-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A- Biodentine: Pulpotomy of permanent tooth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis using Biodentine dose- 2mm thickness frequency- single administration route of administration-

Sponsors

Shobhita Garg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Peri-apical widening (mild)may or msy not be present 2. Sensitivity to hot and cold 3. Acute pain 4. Tenderness on percussion may or may not be present 5. Mandibular first and second permanent molar 6. Limited carious extent that does not require prosthetic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Periapical lesion 2. Excessive coronal damage due to caries 3. Pregnancy 4. Chronic Lesion 5. History of pain, long back 6. Presence of swelling 7. Presence of mobility 8. Periodontal involvement ( presence of pocket)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• Clinical Evaluation - Absence of symptomatology that is, pain, swelling, tender on percussion, mobility. • Radiographic Assessment- Absence of evident pathosis, example, root resorption furcal pathosis, new periapical lesion and/or resolution of apical widening. • Pulp Sensibility Testing-Positive EPT response (higher threshold values than baseline values)Timepoint: Follow up of 1, 3, 6 months will be taken

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Clinical Evaluation - Absence of symptomatology that is, pain, swelling, tender on percussion, mobility. • Radiographic Assessment- Absence of evident pathosis, example, root resorption furcal pathosis, new periapical lesion and/or resolution of apical widening. • Pulp Sensibility Testing-Positive EPT response (higher threshold values than baseline values)Timepoint: Follow up of 8 , 12 months will be taken

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrShweta Verma

Himachal Dental College, Sunder Nagar, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh

drshwetaverma053@gmail.com9418476681

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026