Skip to content

To compare the adequacy of the tissue obtained using different suction techniques during endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy of lymph nodes

COMPARISON OF TISSUE QUALITY USING VARIOUS SUCTION TECHNIQUES IN ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY OF LYMPH NODES: A RANDOMISED STUDY

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/053953
Enrollment
145
Registered
2023-06-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K928- Other specified diseases of the digestive system

Interventions

Intervention1: Wet suction technique with 5-ml suction: In this method, once the stylet is removed, the needle will be flushed with 5 mL of saline replacing the air column. A 5-mL suction syringe with

Sponsors

Jayanta Samanta
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. age >18 years 2. lymph nodes visualized on EUS and amenable for biopsy 3. Informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Age 2. Lymph nodes inaccessible or not visualised with EUS 3. Lymph nodes 4. international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5 5. platelet count of 6. unstable clinical conditions or any contraindication for EUS 7. Inability to give informed consent 8. Pregnancy 9. Lesions returned to be not lymph nodes will be dropped out

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint will be the rate of histological adequacy in patients with lymph nodes who underwent EUS-FNB using 22-G FNB needles with the conventional stylet slow-pull or the wet aspiration with varying suction pressure.Timepoint: At baseline - during tissue acquisition

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Blood contamination of specimensTimepoint: At baseline - during tissue acquisition;Comparison of the two techniques in terms of sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio & accuracy.Timepoint: At baseline - during tissue acquisition;Specimen adequacyTimepoint: At baseline - during tissue acquisition

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactJayanta Samanta

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

dj_samanta@yahoo.co.in09855319529

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026