FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two different anesthetic agents in extraction of milk teeth

Comparative Evaluation Of Anaesthetic Efficacy Of 4% Articaine Vs 2% Lignocaine Infiltration For Extraction In Primary Teeth: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/053896
Enrollment
105
Registered
2023-06-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: 4% Articaine (1:80,000 Adrenaline): Single Buccal/Labial Infiltration of 4% Articaine before extraction Control Intervention1: 2% Lignocaine (1:80,000 adrenaline): Single Buccal/Labial

Sponsors

Pooja Gupta
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children within age group of 5 years and above. Medically fit (ASA I, II). Mentally capable of communication. Cooperative behaviour for dental treatment under local anaesthesia. (FRANKL behaviour rating scale is used for behaviour assessment) Having a primary molar tooth that required extraction. Root resorption of the tooth requiring treatment is more than one-thirds of the root

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medically and mentally compromised children. Children who weigh less than 20 kg. History of allergy to any constituents of local anesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain using Wong baker facial pain scale and Visual analogue scaleTimepoint: Before extraction during extraction after extraction—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Blood pressure Pulse rate Oxygen SaturationTimepoint: Before extraction After extraction—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPooja Gupta

Faculty of dental sciences, BHU, Varanasi

dr.vinaypedo@gmail.com9415087360

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026