FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISON OF HARD AND SOFT TISSUE CHANGES OF EXTRACTION SOCKET PRESERVED WITH BONE GRAFT AND MEMBRANE VS. SPONTANEOUS HEALING OF THE SOCKET.

COMPARISON OF HARD AND SOFT TISSUE CHANGES OF SOCKET PRESERVED WITH INDIGENOUSLY PREPARED DEMINERALISED FREEZE DRIED BONE ALLOGRAFT(DFDBA) & AMNION CHORION MEMBRANE(ACM) VS. SPONTANEOUS HEALING OF THE SOCKET: A CLINICAL STUDY - COMPARISON OF SOCKET WITH AND WITHOUT GRAFT AND MEMBRANE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/053851
Enrollment
24
Registered
2023-06-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K049- Other and unspecified diseases ofpulp and periapical tissues

Interventions

Intervention1: INDIGENOUSLY PREPARED BONE GRAFT AND AMNION CHORION MEMBRANE: AFTER ATRAUMATIC EXTRACTION OF TOOTH THE SOCKET IS PRESERVED WITH INDIGENOUSLY PREPARED BONE GRAFT AND AMNION CHORION MEMBR

Sponsors

Dr RAJESH SAHU
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects of either sex between the age group of 18-55 years, who are willing to sign informed consent form for the study. 2.Subjects in whom extraction is indicated in single rooted tooth in maxilla and /or mandible with intact adjacent teeth for stent fabrication and placement. 3.Clinical root length/residual socket depth should be >8 mm. 4.To select only sites where the tooth location and root angulation is consistent with the ideal implant orientation where inter-occlusal distance is adequate for a dental implant placement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth adjacent to extraction socket having any periapical and/or active periodontal disease. Pregnant women and/or expected pregnancy during the study period. lactating women. smokers smoking more than 10 cigarrete per day. subjects under long term bisphosphponate therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The horizontal bone resorption at the test sites expected to be 1.6 ± 0.55 mm less as compared to control group. The vertical bone resorption at the test sites expected to be 1.1± 0.5 mm less as compared to test group. The test sites expected to show a better preservation of width and thickness of keratinized tissue when compared to control sites.Timepoint: AT BASE LINE AND 6 MONTHS—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The control sites are expected to require an additional bone augmentation at implant placement, when compared to the test sites. Test sites are expected to allows the placement of longer and wider implants when compared to implants inserted in control sites . Timepoint: AFTER A PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRAJESH SAHU

DELHI UNIVERSITY

arundeep.kaur.lamba@gmail.com7011826669

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026