FindTrial
Sign In

A study on comperison of scar after OPEN surgery Versus surgery perfom through small holes in lower back.

Aesthetic-cosmetic concern. Is it Important? A comparative study of posterior-midline and postero-lateral scars in lower back surgery.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/053709
Enrollment
500
Registered
2023-06-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M958- Other specified acquired deformities of musculoskeletal system

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Maruti Health Care
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients having spine problem that will require surgery. People accompanying patients /people to hospital. Community gatherings groups residential commercial areas will be visited to have maximum representative sample of people. Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to completing forms by self or with help if uneducated to read.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Unwillling people Mentally unsound Those with significant severe physical disability and debility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To select better scar between two methods based on patient /people preference of postoperative scars in low back fusion surgery.Timepoint: 2 Years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to identify the choice of scar a person wants to have in the lower back if subjected to a surgery between a Poste- rior midline MISS postoperative scar.Timepoint: 2 Years—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aamir Kydawala
kayda.aamir@gmail.com9265919184

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026