FindTrial
Sign In

Haemodynamic responses following orotracheal intubation in patients with controlled hypertension.

To compare Video laryngoscope versus Macintosh direct laryngoscope on haemodynamic changes in controlled hypertensive patients during oral endotracheal intubation: A Prospective randomized interventional Study in Department of Anaesthesia, SMS Medical College, Jaipur..

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/053510
Enrollment
140
Registered
2023-06-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I10- Essential (primary) hypertension Health Condition 2: I10-I16- Hypertensive diseases

Interventions

Intervention1: video Laryngoscopy for intubation: Compare Video laryngoscope versus Macintosh direct laryngoscope on haemodynamic changes in controlled hypertensive patients during oral endotracheal i

Sponsors

Department of Anesthesiology SMS Medical College and attached Hospitals, Jaipur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patient willing to give consent. 2) Patients undergoing elective surgery with well-controlled hypertension with medication and BP 3))American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Grade II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Anticipated difficult airway or difficult intubation (inter- incisor gap 2) Obesity (BMI >30 Kg /m2). 3) History of coronary artery disease, Cervico-spinal disease, gastroesophageal reflux, Chronic respiratory, kidney, and liver diseases. 4) Pregnancy. 5) Drug allergy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) Mean Hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MBP) and SPO2 at different time intervals. 2) Mean of Rate pressure product Timepoint: Base Line After intubation At 1 MIN At 2 MIN At 3 MIN At 4 MIN At 5 MIN At 10 MIN—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Mean Cormack and Lehane grading. 2. Mean intubation time (seconds). 3. Percentage of success rate at first attempt. 4. Mean number of attempts. 5. proportion of cases required external laryngeal manipulation. 6. Mean of Intubation Difficulty Scale score. 7. Mean of ease of intubation score. 8. Proportion of cases who had any complication related to intubation technique.Timepoint: grading mannually—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ram kishan vyas

SMS Medical College and attached Hospitals, Jaipur

sunitameena98@gmail.com9461290011

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026