Skip to content

A comparative study between I-gel and LMA Blockbuster in terms of safety and efficacy

A Randomised Comparative Study Between I-gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Blockbuster in terms of Safety and Efficacy in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/06/053450
Enrollment
70
Registered
2023-06-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: - Health Condition 3: O086- Damage to pelvic organs and tissues following an ectopic and molar pregnancy Health Condition 4: K319- Disease of stomach and duodenum, unspecified Health Condition 5: N289- Disorder of kidney and ureter, unspecified Health Condition 6: C500- Malignant neoplasm of nipple and areola Health Condition 7: F28- Other psychotic disorder not due to a substance or known physiological condition Health Condition 8: H748- Other specifi

Interventions

Intervention1: nil: nil

Sponsors

Pacific medical college and hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Adult patients aged between 18 to 60 years. 2. Patients of either sex. 3. ASA class I and II 4. Mallampati grade I and II 5. patients weighing between 30-70 kgs. 6. Elective surgeries under General Anaesthesia with controlled ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with ASA Grade III, IV, V. 2. Mallampatti grade III And IV 3.Mouth opening 4.Oral pathology 5.Pregnant females 6.Head and neck surgeries 7.Predicted difficult airway 8.Patients with increased risk of aspirations 9.Patients with cervical spine disease 10.Obese patients with body mass index >70kg 11.History of upper respiratory tract infections 12.Patients with obstruction of the airway beyond the larynx 13.Patients with abnormal or distorted anatomy of larynx

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Ease of insertion. 2.No. of attempts made for sucessful insertion of device. 3.Time taken for insertion of device. 4.Oropharyngeal seal pressure. Timepoint: 1.Ease of insertion. 2.No. of attempts made for sucessful insertion of device. 3.Time taken for insertion of device. 4.Oropharyngeal seal pressure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Adverse effects. 2.Post operative complications.Timepoint: 24 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrSakshi chhibber

Pacific medical college and hospital

chhibber.sakshi3@gmail.com08368443910

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026