Health Condition 1: Z768- Persons encountering health services in other specified circumstances
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: a. Women enrolled in the PRIORITY trial (Recently delivered women confirmed to have moderate anemia, who have no contraindication to iron supplementation, have not already received or are scheduled to receive a transfusion, are age eligible (18 – 45 in India, and 15 – 45 in Pakistan), and consented to participate in the PRIORITY trial and in the IR study) b. Women not enrolled in IV iron trial (Recently delivered women confirmed to have moderate anemia, who have no contraindication to iron supplementation, have not already received or are scheduled to receive a transfusion, are age eligible (18 – 45 in India, and 15 – 45 in Pakistan), and did not consent to participate in the PRIORITY trial, but consented to participate in the IR study) c. Women who were not eligible for the PRIORITY trial (Recently delivered women who have mild or severe anemia, who have received IV iron postpartum, who have no contraindication to iron supplementation, have not already received or are scheduled to receive a transfusion, are age eligible (18 – 45 in India, and 15 – 45 in Pakistan), and are not part of the PRIORITY trial, but consent to participate in the IR study) d. Husbands and mothers-in-law of women enrolled in the PRIORITY trial (Husband or mother-in-law of a woman enrolled in the PRIORITY trial, = 18 years, and consent to participate in IR study) e. Health workers, their supervisors, and hospital administrators involved in the PRIORITY trial (Work in one of the target roles in one of the study sites, consent to participate in the IR study)
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: a. Decline to provide consent to participate in the IR study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Intervention characteristics o Evidence strength and quality o Relative advantage o Complexity Outer setting o Patient needs and resources o External policies Inner setting o Implementation climate o Relative priority o Readiness for implementation o Available resources Individual characteristics o Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention o Self-efficacy Process o Formally appointed internal implementation leaders/championsTimepoint: At the end of the study | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Acceptability of intervention: Women’s, family members’, and health workers’ perceptions of the acceptability of the interventionTimepoint: At the end of the study;Cost of implementation: Total monthly cost for intervention delivery, average intervention delivery costs per womanTimepoint: At the end of the study;Feasibility of intervention: Health workers’, supervisors’, hospital administrators’, women’s, and family members’ perceptions of the feasibility of the interventionTimepoint: At the end of the study;Fidelity of intervention: Percentage of health workers who follow the procedures for implementing the interventionTimepoint: At the end of the study;Implementation strategies: Description of each strategy for implementing the IV iron intervention, including the actor, action, action target, temporality, implementation outcomes targeted, and justification for the strategy usedTimepoint: At the end of the study | — |
Countries
India, Pakistan
Contacts
Public ContactDr Shivaprasad S Goudar
J N Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research
Outcome results
None listed