Evaluation and comparison of functional and aesthetic outcomes of CAD-CAM Baltic denture and conventional complete denture.

Evaluation of Functional and Esthetic outcomes of Removable Complete Dentures fabricated with CAD/CAM technology- A Cross-over Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/05/053220

Enrollment

Registered

2023-05-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K081- Complete loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: CAD/CAM Complete Denture: 1 Set of complete denture given for 1 month and then follow up Control Intervention1: Conventional complete dentures: 1 set of complete denture to be given for

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Completely edentulous patients with class I ridge relation, Class I and II ridge morphology (PDI) Adult patients needing new complete dentures Mentally receptiveness Patients able to understand the informed consent Patient who are able to come for 9-10 visits. Absence of dysfunctional disorders of the masticatory system Absence of debilitating systemic diseases

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate in the study. Patients with class II and class III ridge relation. Patients with past history of Complete dentures Symptoms of Temporomandibular disorders Patients with severe xerostomia Patients with parafunctional habits Patients with severe oral manifestations of systemic disease Psychologic or psychiatric conditions that could influence response to treatment. Patient asking for implant supported/retained prostheses

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Difference in the functional, aesthetic outcomes, patient satisfaction and comfort between CAD-CAM Baltic denture system and bilaterally balanced complete denture prostheses.Timepoint: 2 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Difference in the functional, aesthetic outcomes, patient satisfaction and comfort between CAD-CAM Baltic denture system and bilaterally balanced complete denture prostheses.Timepoint: 1 month	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPRIYASHA RAVINDRANATH WASE

Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pondicherry

manoharanps@igids.ac.in9865019673

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026