Skip to content

BLIND TRACHEAL INTUBATION USING SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE

A CLINICAL COMPARISION OF BLIND INTUBATION USING LMA BLOCKBUSTERâ?¢ AND AMBU-AURAGAINâ?¢ IN ADULT PATIENTS UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA : A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/05/053053
Enrollment
51
Registered
2023-05-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Blind Tracheal intubation using supraglottic airway device: Comparison of first attempt success rate of blind intubation through LMA BLOCKBUSTER and AMBU AURAGAIN in patients planned fo

Sponsors

JYOTI KUMARI
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients requiring general anaesthesia and planned for elective surgery which require tracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A)Patientâ??s refusal b) Patients below 18 years of age and above 60 years of age c) Pregnant female d) Morbid obese e) Patients with cervical injury f) Inter incisor distance g) patients with restricted neck movement h) patients with oropharyngeal pathology I ) ASA III and ASA IV j)Severe pulmonary morbidity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of first attempt success rate of blind intubation through LMA Blockbuster v/s Ambu Auragain in patients planned for tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.Timepoint: From the time of insertion of SAD to confirmation of correct placement by end tidal CO2 waveforms and confirmation of correct placement of ETT by end tidal CO2 waveforms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a) Time of insertion of Supraglottic device and endotracheal intubation b) Ease of insertion of supraglottic device and endotracheal tube c) Adequacy of ventilation with supraglottic devices d) Oropharyngeal leak pressure e) Intraoperative haemodynamics of the patients f) Post operative complicationsTimepoint: Time required for insertion of supraglottic airway device will be from the time of taking the device in hand till confirmation of proper placement of the device by appearance of end tidal CO2 waveform. Time taken for blind intubation will be from time of taking endotracheal tube in hand till confirmation of proper placement of the endotracheal tube by appearance of end tidal CO2 waeforms. Intraoperative haemodynamics will be monitored every 2 mins.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Tanmay Tiwari

King George Medical College

tanmayanesthesia@gmail.com9452526270

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026