FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between free flaps and distant pedicled flaps for resurfacing upper limb defects

A comparative analysis of outcomes between distant pedicled flaps and free flaps for resurfacing upper limb defects

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/05/052770
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-05-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: distant pedicled flap: selected patients will be randomised into 2 groups. group 1 will undergo distant pedicled flap for upper limb reconstruction. group 2 will undergo free flap for u

Sponsors

R Saradha
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients with soft tissue defects of upper limb due to trauma, burns, soft tissue tumors, infection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients not fit for prolonged anaesthesia, not willing for prolonged follow up, under age of 12

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
compare distant pedicled flaps and free flaps used for upper limb reconstruction I terms of functional, aesthetic and psychosocial outcomesTimepoint: 3 months and 6 months post operatively—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to identify and compare factors associated with complications in patients undergoing distant pedicled flaps and free flaps for soft tissue defects of upper limbTimepoint: 3 months and 6 months post operatively—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactR Saradha

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur

drpckala@gmail.com8460952204

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026