Skip to content

TO COMPARE TWO METHODS OF SURGERY TO INCREASE WIDTH OF ATTACHED GUMS

Comparative Evaluation of Healing Outcomes Between Two Different Modifications of Apically Repositioned Flap - A Pilot Randomized Clinical Study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/05/052695
Enrollment
10
Registered
2023-05-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A: Modified Apically Repositioned Flap technique: Group A: Teeth with inadequate width of attached gingiva treated with Modified Apically Repositioned Flap technique to evaluate w

Sponsors

MGM Dental College and Hospital Kamothe Navi Mumbai
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy male and female patient aged 18-45 years rendering informed consent to participate in the study. 2. Mandibular anterior teeth with: i. Fair prognosis. ii. Adequate vestibular depth. iii. Intact or reduced periodontium with inadequate width of attached gingiva diagnosed by positive pull test. iv. No active inflammation present.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Medically compromised patients. 2. Pregnant and lactating women. 3. Mobility in the teeth 4. Teeth with hopeless prognosis. 5. Any mucocutaneous disorders. 6. Pan chewers, tobacco chewers, smokers. 7. Malposed teeth. 8. Active orthodontic treatment. 9. Prosthesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Healing outcomes as follows of Modified Apically Repositioned Flap technique is comparable to that of Inlay connective tissue graft technique: â?¢ Change in probing pocket depth. â?¢ Change in clinical attachment level 1. Change in width of attached gingiva with no increase in vestibular depth, 2. Change in width of keratinized mucosa 3. Change in the thickness of gingival phenotype which might not change post-surgery)Timepoint: At baseline, at 6 weeks from baseline and at 12 weeks from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shruti Mhatre

MGM Dental College And Hospital, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai.

drvinkin@gmail.com9769804390

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026