FindTrial
Sign In

uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament in management of apical prolapse

uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation: Comparing outcomes of two vaginal suspension surgical technique in the management of pelvic organ prolapse.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/05/052667
Enrollment
152
Registered
2023-05-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N812- Incomplete uterovaginal prolapse Health Condition 2: N993- Prolapse of vaginal vault after hysterectomy

Interventions

Intervention1: group1: sacrospinous ligament suspension group2: high uterosacral lig suspension: group 1 will receive sacrospinous lig fixation and group 2 will receive high uterosacral lig suspension

Sponsors

AIIMS Patna
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: all women presenting with pelvic organ prolapse and undergoing surgical management will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Abnormal cervical smear Pelvic radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
anatomical and surgical successTimepoint: 1,6, 12, 24 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare short term outcomes - operating time, Blood loss, Duration of hospital stay, Neurological pain and complications including major vascular injury, bladder injury , ureter injury, ureteral obstruction , bowel injury between two groups.Timepoint: perioperative period—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sangam Jha

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES PATNA

sangam.jha78@gmail.com07389831560

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026