FindTrial
Sign In

How well do ultrasound scoring systems predict ovarian malignancies?

Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasonographic Scoring Systems and Clinical Profile in differentiating Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/05/052553
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-05-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C56- Malignant neoplasm of ovary

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 100 women presenting to Gynaecology OPD with Adnexal Masses

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Refusal to give consent 2. Women with follicular cysts and corpus luteal cysts 3. Women without pathological diagnosis and / or insufficient follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Calculate the diagnostic accuracy of O-RADS Ultrasonographic scoring system to differentiate benign and malignant adnexal masses with pathological findings as reference standardTimepoint: 1 year—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of change in the radiological characteristics during follow-up USG of ORADS 2 lesionsTimepoint: 1 year;Diagnostic accuracy of other US Scoring systems i.e. RMI 4, IOTA SR and ADNEX RulesTimepoint: 1 year;Identify descriptors of Adnexal masses on various US scoring systems and their association with different pathologiesTimepoint: 1 year—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSUJATA SIWATCH

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh

siwatch1@yahoo.com0172-2756331

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026