Difference between two types of treatment of hip fractures

The comparison of Clinical, Radiological and Functional outcome of Femoral Neck System and Dynamic Hip Screw in Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults - A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/05/052518

Enrollment

Registered

2023-05-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S720- Fracture of head and neck of femur

Interventions

Intervention1: Femoral neck System: â?¢ â?¢ The guide of the insert is used to drill the hole for the antirotation-screw. Drilling is done until the fixation sleeve stops on the guide of the insert. T

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Isolated unilateral intracapsular femoral neck fractures 2. patients aged 16-60 years 3. Patients giving consent for study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with Sepsis 2. Patients with history of malignant primary or metastatic tumors 3. Open fractures 4. Basicervical fractures 5. Associated Ipsilateral femoral shaft / Distal femur fracture 6. History of any other comorbidity which may affect the gait of ipsilateral limb 7. Fracture due to pathological bone lesion at local site

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Radiological fracture union : RUSH score Timepoint: At 6-month mark	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Development of: 1.Non-Union 2. Mal-union 3.Implant cut-out 4. Avascular necrosis of femoral head 5. Fracture of implant system 6. Fracture of femur under implant system Timepoint: X-ray pelvis with bilateral hip AP view with ipsilateral thigh with hip AP/ Lateral views on POD 2 , POD 14 , 6 weeks , 3 months , 6 months post-operatively and NCCT pelvis with bilateral hip on POD 2, 6 months post-operatively;Modified Harris Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Score-33, milestone diary , Passive Range of MotionTimepoint: POD 14 , 6 weeks , 3 months , 6 months post-operatively;Patient mobilization with walker: full weight bearing or as per patient toleranceTimepoint: POD 1	—

Measure

Time frame

Development of: 1.Non-Union 2. Mal-union 3.Implant cut-out 4. Avascular necrosis of femoral head 5. Fracture of implant system 6. Fracture of femur under implant system Timepoint: X-ray pelvis with bilateral hip AP view with ipsilateral thigh with hip AP/ Lateral views on POD 2 , POD 14 , 6 weeks , 3 months , 6 months post-operatively and NCCT pelvis with bilateral hip on POD 2, 6 months post-operatively;Modified Harris Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Score-33, milestone diary , Passive Range of MotionTimepoint: POD 14 , 6 weeks , 3 months , 6 months post-operatively;Patient mobilization with walker: full weight bearing or as per patient toleranceTimepoint: POD 1

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ira Pachori

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Samarthmittal@gmail.com9013562489

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026