Skip to content

Comparison of Peri-Implant Clinical and Radiological Parameters after using Glycine Air Abrasion, Soft Tissue Diode Laser or Titanium Brush adjunctive to Conventional Peri-Implantitis Therapy

Comparison of Peri-Implant Clinical and Radiological Parameters after using Glycine Air Abrasion, Soft Tissue Diode Laser or Titanium Brush adjunctive to Conventional Peri-Implantitis Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiological Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/05/052252
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-05-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K056- Periodontal disease, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional: (Conventional/Control group), granulation tissue will be entirely removed from the osseous defect and mechanical instrumentation of the implant surface will be achieved wi
Air abrasion with amino acid glycine powder will be used for 5 sec. before irrigation
resective or regenerative procedure (as needed) and suturing. A specially designed device (Air Prophy UnitTM) with a tumbler and sleek nozzle will be used for air polishing. The tumbler will carry slu

Sponsors

Dr Dipanshu Pahuja
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients present with one or more implants showing signs of peri-implantitis with the following conditions will be included in the study: a. Bleeding/suppuration on probing in peri-implant tissues. b. PPD >= 3 mm around implants. c. Radiographic evidence of bone loss around implants and/or exposure of implant threads clinically and/or radiographically. d. No occlusal overload (checked by articulating papers).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a. Acute infection. b. Medically compromised patients. c. Uncooperative patients. d. Heavy smokers. e. Non-compliant patients for oral hygiene maintenance. f. Mechanical failure like fixture fracture g. Habits leading to trauma from occlusion. h. Complete mobility of the implant or advanced periimplantitis lesion ( >6mm/ >50% implant length exposed) according to Monje et al.â??s classification.7 i. Inflammatory diseases with exaggerated responses like rheumatoid arthritis or granulomatous diseases that might influence treatment outcome. j. Patients on long term steroids or bisphosphonates therapy. k. Patient having frank gingivitis or periodontitis in the vicinity of periimplantitis site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Probing pocket depth (PPD) 2.Relative attachment level (RAL) 3.Marginal bone level (MBL) 4.Stability of implant Timepoint: Baseline, Three months, Six Months and Nine months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Gingivitis Index (Loe H and Silness J,1963) 2. Plaque index (Turesky-Gilmore-Glickman modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index,1970) 3. Bleeding on probing Timepoint: Baseline, Three months, Six Months and Nine months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDipanshu Pahuja

V.Y.W.S. Dental College and Hopital, Amravati

simpar74@gmail.com9977132697

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026