Skip to content

A comparative study between two teaching modalities ,e-learning video and conventional lecture for BLS training in lay persons.

A comparative study between e-learning video and lecture for basic life support training in lay persons - A randomized controlled trail

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/04/052046
Enrollment
350
Registered
2023-04-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Richa Singh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Only School teachers and professors will be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Persons who has taken a CPR training in past 12 months, or a certified BLS instructor or person who is not able to perform CPR would be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall pass rate after completion of lecture demonstrations.Timepoint: Overall pass rate after completion of lecture demonstrations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Chest compressions depth , rate, hand positioning and chest recoil. Tidal volume and percentage of successful rescue breathing. Time to initiate BLS and shock delivery Participants self perceived skills and rating of teaching methods DrTimepoint: After completion of lectures and demonstrations

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Swati

Indira gandhi institute of medical sciences,Patna

deepakswat@yahoo.com9113463130

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026