FindTrial
Sign In

A comparative study of immediately loaded dental implants with xenograft vs allograft.

IMMEDIATELY LOADED DENTAL IMPLANTS USING XENOGRAFT (BONE RING TECHNIQUE) VS ALLOGRAFTâ?? A COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/04/051757
Enrollment
18
Registered
2023-04-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Group 1: In this group, implant is placed immediately into the fresh extraction socket with xenograft using bone ring technique. : The bone ring is introduced into the prepared defectiv

Sponsors

Meenakshi chandaka
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All selected patients having fresh extraction sockets with vertical and horizontal bone defects. Patients who can understand the treatment procedure and maintenance schedule.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with any systemic disease that could affect bone healing were excluded from the study. Patients with bone metabolic disorders. Pregnant and lactating woman. Patients undergoing radiation and immunosuppressive therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
HEALING INDEXTimepoint: 2 WEEKS POST OPERATIVELY—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WITH XENOGRAFT AND ALLOGRAFTTimepoint: BASELINE AND 6 MONTHS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr CHANDAKA MEENAKSHI

PANINEEYA MAHAVIDYALAYA INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTRE,

veerureddy@yahoo.com9866199902

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026