Skip to content

Comparative Evaluation Of Two Gum Surgical Techniques In Treatment Of Intrabony Defects

"COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE FLAP SURGERY VS CONVENTIONAL FLAP SURGERY IN TREATMENT OF INTRABONY DEFECT WITH CERABONE- A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL"

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/04/051756
Enrollment
18
Registered
2023-04-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K00-K14- Diseases of oral cavity and salivary glands

Interventions

Intervention1: Minimally Invasive Flap Surgery with Cerabone: For the MIS technique, incisions will be made on the facial as described by Harrel SK. The intrabony defect and root surfaces will be debr

Sponsors

Dr Bhumika Jhawar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age more than or equal to 18 years. Presence of atleast one periodontal intrabony defect that must involve an anterior or premolar tooth or mesial surface of molar tooth. Defect must be associated with >5mm. No prior history of any surgical procedures on the site to be treated. Systemically healthy subjects.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Tooth is periodontically hopeless (i.e. mobility >2 or furcation >2) Previous periodontal surgery within last 2 years in the area of interest. Pregnant and lactating women Habit of tobacco use (smoked and smokeless) Systemic conditions which are contraindication for periodontal surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Minimally invasive flap approach would be showing better or same clinical results in correcting clinical parameter (probing pocket depth & relative clinical attachment level) when compared to conventional flap approach.Timepoint: baseline, 1 week, 3 month and 6 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Minimally invasive flap surgery, expected to show same or better clinical results in patient perception of pain, satisfaction and esthetics when compared to conventional flap surgery.Timepoint: baseline, 1 week, 3 month and 6 month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bhumika Jhawar

Government Dental College, Raipur

shirishtirkey@gmail.com9399093749

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026