FindTrial
Sign In

To compare the methods used to faster the orthodontic tooth movement in humans

A comparative assessment of tooth movement through an Invasive and Non-invasive method using Microosteoperforation and Low-Level Laser Therapy: An In-vivo study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/04/051524
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-04-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Invasive method (MOP): MOPs will be performed under local anesthesia (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) and with standard asepsis. No flap will be raised. The soft tissue thickne

Sponsors

Dr Soumya Gupta
Lead Sponsor
Dr D Ashok
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy periodontal condition. 2. Patients with Angleâ??s Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion who require extraction of maxillary first premolars and all first premolars. 3. Average Growth Pattern or Normo-divergent FMA is between 21degree to 29degree 4.No previous history of orthodontic treatment. 5. The full complement of teeth present except 3rd molars.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Long-term use of analgesics, phenytoin, cyclosporine, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers. 2. Extreme skeletal malocclusions indicate orthognathic surgery. 3. Any systemic disease. 4. Patient with the habit of gutka chewing, pan chewing, and smoking. 5. Patient with poor oral hygiene and periodontally compromised teeth. 6. Potential participants who did not consent to the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the effect of Orthodontic Tooth Movement by Micro-osetoperforation and photobiostimulation by low-level laser therapy on the rate of canine retraction. Timepoint: Each patient will be observed for 3 months for the study purpose.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
b. To determine the amount and rate of canine retraction by non-surgical (low-level laser therapy) methodsTimepoint: 3 months;a. To determine the amount and rate of canine retraction by surgical (MOP) method.Timepoint: 3 months;c. To evaluate the pain perception of patients during canine retraction in all the study groups. Timepoint: 1 months;d. To compare the rate of maxillary canine retraction between all 4 Groups and, anchorage loss in all the study groups. Timepoint: 1 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr D Ashok

D. Y. Patil School of Dentistry, Nerul Navi Mumbai

drsoumyagupta8@gmail.com09770170432

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026