To compare PAIN PERCEPTION in children WITH AN ELECTRONICALLY ASSISTED INJECTION SYSTEM AND CONVENTIONAL NEEDLE METHOD.

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PAIN PERCEPTION in children WITH AN ELECTRONICALLY ASSISTED INJECTION SYSTEM AND CONVENTIONAL NEEDLE METHOD: A SPLIT MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2023/04/051267

Enrollment

Registered

2023-04-03

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K045- Chronic apical periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Electronically Assisted Injection System.: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PAIN PERCEPTION in children WITH AN ELECTRONICALLY ASSISTED INJECTION SYSTEM AND CONVENTIONAL NEEDLE METHOD. Interve

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -No previous experience of dental needles. -Patients with Frankl ++ during opd. -Need for extraction and LA administration through infiltration.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Patient with any allergy. -History of swelling associated with the tooth -Patient Unwilling to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To clinically evaluate pain perception by LA administration using electronically assisted injection system and conventional needle in children. Timepoint: 1 week	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare pain perception using electronically assisted injection system and conventional needle method during LA administration in children. Timepoint: 18months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Raju Patil

Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital

Pedodontics.sdch@sinhgad.edu8871963896

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026