Skip to content

comparison of spinal mannequin based teaching with conventional teaching for spinal anesthesia.

Comparison of spinal mannequin based simulation teaching with conventional didactic method of teaching subarachnoid block in novices: A randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/03/051215
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-03-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: simulated Training: participants who are trained on spinal mannequin. Control Intervention1: conventional: Participants not trained on spinal mannequin but only recieved didactic teachi

Sponsors

Deepanshu Dang
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Novice post graduate students of Anaesthesiology

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Those who have previously observed or trained in neuraxial anaesthesia,or are not willing,or does not want to be assessed, will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
number of successful first attempt of spinal needle placement into subarachnoid space.Timepoint: baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To compare total number of attempts for successful spinal needle placement 2.To compare number of needle-bone contacts 3.To compare ease of landmark palpation of space using Likert scale 4.To compare time taken to successfully perform subarachnoid block 5.To compare complications (dural puncture , vasovagal shock ,Bloody tap), 6.To compare able to appreciate give away/loss of resistanceTimepoint: baseline

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactTanvi Meshram

AIIMS JODHPUR

tanvimeshram162@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026