Skip to content

comparison of pain control in removal of upper molar tooth using two different techniques of anesthesia

Comparison of efficacy between Posterior Superior Alveolar nerve block and local infiltration to control pain during extraction of maxillary molars â?? a randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2023/03/051161
Enrollment
84
Registered
2023-03-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R52- Pain, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: posterior superior alveolar nerve block: Posterior superior alveolar nerve block is a standard nerve block recommended for the extraction of maxillary second and third molars. This nerv

Sponsors

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient requiring removal of maxillary second and third molar 2. Patient under ASA 1 status 3. Both intra-alveolar and trans-alveolar extraction shall be included 4. Patients above 18 years of age 5. Both males and females shall be included

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severely comorbid patient â?? carcinoma of the oral cavity 2. Patient with a history of uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac patients, chemoradiation, chronic smoker, patient on OCP or history of CIPA 3. Patient with a periodontally compromised dental condition 4. Patient with limited mouth opening 5. Patient allergic to lignocaine 6. Patients below 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
IMMEDIATE OUTCOMES: 1.Pain scores in both groups 2.Count of supplementary injection in both groups 3.Count of analgesics required post procedure in both groups Timepoint: IMMEDIATE OUTCOMES: 1.Pain scores in both groups 5 min after local anesthesia administration, immediately after extraction, 15 min after extraction 2.Count of supplementary injection in both groups 3.Count of analgesics required post procedure in both groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
SECONDARY OUTCOME â?? comparison of onset of anesthesia in both techniquesTimepoint: at intevals 2 min and 4 min

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSreea Roy

Manipal college of dental sciences, Manipal

sreea.roy@manipal.edu08777659961

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026